Collective Agreements : Incentive Contracts
نویسنده
چکیده
The paper considers collective agreements that are signed by a government agency and an industry which have an energy saving target. The target achievement is observable, but the energy saving actions undertaken by firms in the industry are not. We consider such agreements as firm contracts that depend on whether the industry complies with the target or not. We show that first best regulation can be achieved when the agency can punish firms in case of non-compliance and reward firms in case of compliance. This result is in accordance with the moral hazard literature. However, if the agency, due to political constraints, is unable to punish firms, first best regulation cannot be achieved and this type of regulation is no longer collusion-proof. Furthermore, we show that when firms’ benefit from compliance with the agreement is measured as an exemption from paying a CO2 tax, welfare is highest when agreements are signed with a homogenous industry.
منابع مشابه
Competitive Balance and Income Redistribution in Team Sports
This paper starts with the observation that in most individualistic sports (e.g. golf, tennis, boxing) rewards are highly dependent on performance, while in most team sports direct rewards are almost independent of performance. This paper takes the perspective of Contest (Tournament) Theory and considers the incentive properties of revenue sharing agreements which are performance independent an...
متن کاملOn Delegation under Relational Contracts
In this paper, a principals decision between delegating two tasks or handling one of the two tasks herself is analyzed. We assume that the principal uses both, formal contracts and informal agreements sustained by the value of future relationships (relational contracts) as incentive device. It is found that the principal is less likely to delegate both tasks in a dynamic setting than in a stat...
متن کاملContracting for Non - Point - Source Pollution Abatement
This paper presents an incentive scheme to control agricultural non-point-source pollution. The analysis is based on a nested agent framework with three parties; farmers, a country’s government, and the governments of all countries that affect each other’s environmental quality. Unlike previous analysis of incentive schemes to control agricultural pollution, we suggest non-individual contracts ...
متن کاملHow Ethical is the Australian Workplace Relations Act?
The paper raises a number of issues regarding the ethical character of the Coalition government s Australian Workplace Relations Act. While key principles such as freedom of association and freedom of choice are incorporated into the legislation, it is argued that equity is a higher order ethic. On the face of it, the language of the legislation addresses equity, but notwithstanding the Coaliti...
متن کاملContracting for Innovation: Vertical Disintegration and Interfirm Collaboration
=255223 (on file with the Columbia Law Review) (reviewing experimental evidence on fairness and reciprocity). 156. Scott & Stephan, Leviathan, supra note 143, at 102. 157. Id. 158. Fehr 8c Gächter, Fairness and Retaliation, supra note 143, at lbO-70. 159. Ernst Fehr 8c Simon Gächter, Do Incentive Contracts Undermine Voluntary Cooperation? 1 (Inst. for Empirical Research in Econ., Univ. of Zuric...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
دوره شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2002